Phase 1: Prepare
Step 1 Warm-up recall
From Module 1: how is Cohen’s d calculated, and what do the labels 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 mean?
Private: nothing you type here is sent or stored.
Step 2 Learning goal
By the end of this lesson you can:
- read the direction and strength of a correlation coefficient (Foundation);
- convert r into the share of variation accounted for, and say what that does and does not mean (Core);
- explain why predictors overlap and why strength depends on sample and measure (Core).
Phase 2: Teach
Step 3 A familiar example
Height predicts weight, but not perfectly: some tall people are light and some short people are heavy. A well-being predictor works the same way. It shifts the odds without fixing the outcome for any one person.
Step 4 Clear explanation
The correlation coefficient, r, runs from −1 to +1. The sign gives the direction (positive: both rise together; negative: one rises as the other falls). The distance from zero gives the strength. Cohen (1988) offered rough anchors: about 0.1 small, 0.3 medium, 0.5 large. They are conventions, not verdicts.
Squaring r gives r², the share of the variation in one measure that is statistically accounted for by the other. r = 0.30 gives 0.09, or 9%. That does not make the predictor “only 9% important”: it says that, across a group, most of the differences between people remain unexplained by this one factor.
Three cautions. Predictors overlap (income, health and relationships are related), so their shares cannot simply be added. Strength depends on the sample and measure: a narrow range of incomes weakens a correlation. And correlation describes a group, not a person.
Step 5 Worked example (4 marks)
Predictor A correlates 0.50 with life satisfaction and predictor B correlates 0.25.
- A: 0.50 × 0.50 = 0.25, so 25% of the variation. (1 mark)
- B: 0.25 × 0.25 = 0.0625, so about 6%. (1 mark)
- A’s r is twice B’s, but its share of variation is four times B’s (25 ÷ 6.25 = 4). (1 mark)
- If A and B overlap, together they account for less than 31%, because the shares are not additive. (1 mark)
Phase 3: Practise
Step 6 Learner practice (instant-marked)
2. Which correlation is the strongest?
Strength is the distance from zero, so −0.60 is strongest. The sign shows direction only.
3. Predictor A has r = 0.40 and predictor B has r = 0.20. Which statement is right?
0.40² = 0.16 and 0.20² = 0.04, so A accounts for four times as much.
4. A study finds r = 0.30 between a habit and life satisfaction. Which conclusion is justified?
r² = 0.09. A correlation describes a group pattern and does not show cause.
Phase 4: Close
Step 7 Recap
- r runs from −1 to +1: sign is direction, distance from zero is strength.
- r² is the share of variation accounted for. Strong-looking r values give modest shares.
- Predictors overlap, so shares are not additive.
- Strength depends on sample and measure.
Step 8 Exit ticket (ungraded)
Pick a claim you have heard (for example, “exercise makes you happier”). What r would make it worth acting on, and what else would you need to know?
Private: nothing you type here is sent or stored.
Step 9 Go further (Extension)
Find a published correlation between a lifestyle factor and life satisfaction. Record the sample, the r, the r², and whether the authors claim cause.
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Why it fails |
|---|---|
| Reading r = 0.30 as “30%” | The share of variation is r², which is 9%. |
| Reading a negative r as weak | The sign is direction; strength is distance from zero. |
| Adding the r² of several predictors | Predictors overlap, so the total is smaller than the sum. |
Limits. Cohen’s anchors are rough. What counts as a useful predictor depends on cost, risk and the outcome.