Phase 1: Prepare
Step 1 Warm-up recall
From M3.L4: name two threats to a personal experiment.
Private: nothing you type here is sent or stored.
Step 2 Learning goal
By the end of this lesson you can:
- name four limits of a personal experiment (Foundation);
- explain regression to the mean (Core);
- turn limits into careful report wording (Core).
Phase 2: Teach
Step 3 A familiar example
You start a new habit during your worst week of the term. A month later you feel better. Was it the habit, or would the week have passed anyway?
Step 4 Clear explanation
Limits you should look for in your own data:
- Expectation. You know the habit is supposed to help, so you may rate your days more kindly. You cannot blind yourself.
- Regression to the mean. Extreme periods tend to be followed by more typical ones. If your baseline happened to be a low stretch, ratings may rise without any habit.
- Concurrent events. Exams, weather, illness, news or travel affect ratings. Your daily notes help here.
- Sample of one, no comparison. You have no control group. You cannot say what your ratings would have been without the habit.
- Measurement. A single daily rating is noisy and depends on the scale you chose.
These limits do not make your experiment worthless. They set what you can honestly claim: that ratings were higher, lower or the same, with a dose and an adherence, and that the cause is open. An experiment with a better design (random order, comparison, blinding where possible) would be needed to claim more.
Step 5 Worked example (4 marks)
Your report says “the habit raised my mood by 0.7”.
- “Raised” claims cause; the data show ratings were 0.7 higher. (1 mark)
- No comparison, so you cannot rule out regression to the mean or concurrent events. (1 mark)
- You knew the habit was supposed to help, so expectation may contribute. (1 mark)
- Better wording: “My ratings in weeks 3 and 4 averaged 0.7 higher than baseline; I cannot say the habit caused this.” (1 mark)
Phase 3: Practise
Step 6 Learner practice (instant-marked)
1. What is regression to the mean?
Unusually low or high periods tend to move back toward typical levels.
2. Why can you not blind yourself in a personal experiment?
You know what you did, so expectation may creep in.
3. What is the best wording of a result with no comparison?
State the data and leave cause open.
4. Which helps check for concurrent events?
Notes let you see what else happened.
Phase 4: Close
Step 7 Recap
- Expectation, regression to the mean, concurrent events, sample of one and noisy measurement.
- Limits set what you can claim.
- Use “was higher than”, not “raised”.
Step 8 Exit ticket (ungraded)
Name the two limits most likely to apply to your own four weeks.
Private: nothing you type here is sent or stored.
Step 9 Go further (Extension)
Design (on paper) a better experiment: how would you add a comparison period, and what would it cost you?
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Why it fails |
|---|---|
| Hiding unhelpful limits | Honest limits are part of the report. |
| Deleting low-rated days | It biases the result. |
| Claiming cause from a sample of one | You have no comparison. |
Limits. This lesson gives general logic about personal experiments. It does not quote effect sizes.