Specialty Digest

Global English editionLearners’ Study Dashboard — in development
The Knowledge Library for All

Online Courses / Executive Track / AI Strategy for Decision-Makers

Module 1 · Lesson 3 · Core

Counting the cost side: a first value case

Work through an invented example that includes the tool fee, the work still done by hand and the cost of correcting errors.

  • 50 minutes
  • Serves O2
  • Assumes M1.L2

Phase 1: Prepare

Step 1 Warm-up recall

From M1.L2: write the four tests for a good use case.

Private: nothing you type here is sent or stored.

Step 2 Learning goal

By the end of this lesson you can:

  • compute the current cost of a process (Foundation);
  • compute the cost with an AI tool, including errors (Core);
  • state the saving and what it depends on (Core).

Phase 2: Teach

Step 3 A familiar example

A vendor presents a single number: “save 80% of the work”. A careful buyer asks about the remaining 20% of work, the monthly fee, and the cost of fixing mistakes.

Step 4 Clear explanation

A first value case compares two monthly costs: the cost of the process today and the cost with the tool. Here is an invented example of 2,000 invoices a month, each taking 5 minutes at £0.60 per minute. The tool costs £1,500 a month, handles 80% of invoices automatically, and makes errors on 2% of those, each costing £20 to correct.

LineWorkingMonthly amount (£, invented)
Current cost2,000 invoices × 5 min × £0.60 per min = 2,000 × £3.006,000
Tool feeFixed monthly fee1,500
Still done by hand20% of 2,000 = 400 invoices × £3.001,200
Correcting AI errors2% of 1,600 handled = 32 × £20640
New cost1,500 + 1,200 + 6403,340
Saving6,000 − 3,3402,660
Before6000After3340Invented example. Saving 6,000 minus 3,340 equals 2,660 per month
Invented example: monthly cost of processing 2,000 invoices, before and after an AI tool, in pounds.

The saving is £2,660 a month, or £31,920 a year, but it depends on the assumptions: the share handled automatically, the error rate and the cost per error. A prudent leader tests these numbers on a pilot before committing. Notice that the error line is a real cost: if the error rate doubled to 4%, the correction cost would be £1,280 and the saving would fall to £2,020. See the entry on risk scoring for ways to rank risks.

Step 5 Worked example (4 marks)

Invented: 1,000 documents a month, 4 minutes each at £0.50 per minute. A tool costs £600 a month, handles 50% automatically and errs on 4% of those, at £10 each.

  1. Current cost = 1,000 × 4 × £0.50 = £2,000. (1 mark)
  2. By hand: 500 × £2.00 = £1,000. (1 mark)
  3. Errors: 4% of 500 = 20; 20 × £10 = £200. (1 mark)
  4. New cost = 600 + 1,000 + 200 = £1,800; saving = £200 a month (10%). (1 mark)

Phase 3: Practise

Step 6 Learner practice (instant-marked)

1. 2,000 invoices at 5 minutes and £0.60 per minute cost:

2. A tool handles 80% of 2,000 invoices. How many are handled automatically?

3. 2% of 1,600 handled invoices are wrong. How many errors?

4. Old cost £6,000 and new cost £3,340. The saving is:

Phase 4: Close

Step 7 Recap

  • New cost = tool fee + work still done by hand + cost of correcting errors.
  • Saving = old cost − new cost.
  • Test the assumptions on a pilot.

Step 8 Exit ticket (ungraded)

List the three cost lines you would add to a vendor’s “save 80%” claim.

Private: nothing you type here is sent or stored.

Step 9 Go further (Extension)

Recalculate the example with an error rate of 4% and see how the saving changes.

Common mistakes

MistakeWhy it fails
Counting only the savingInclude the fee, manual work and error costs.
Using the vendor’s accuracy as your error rateTest on your own data.
Ignoring the cost of fixing errorsEach error has a cost.

Limits. All figures are invented. A real value case also counts set-up, training, staff time, support, and benefits that are hard to measure.